Stuart Weitzman Satin Slingback Pumps visit new u4FInFftTN

Stuart Weitzman Satin Slingback Pumps visit new u4FInFftTN
Stuart Weitzman Satin Slingback Pumps
  • Events
  • Products
  • Frame Builders
  • Randomness
  • Beautiful Bicycles
  • Rides
  • Shop Visits
  • Recent Roll
  • Reviews
  • Event Recap
  • Who is the Radavist?

    A group of individuals who share a love of cycling and the outdoors. We will always stop for a photo, or to hit a jump. Rubber side up!

    We believe the outdoors should be respected. Please, pack it in and pack it out. Leave it better, even. Remember, we’re all ambassadors for cycling, so be polite on the road and the trails and observe the Hush Puppies Mens Bob Portlan huge surprise sale online c1iRgHkX9

    What does the Radavist mean?

    Rad + Atavist = RADAVIST

    Why does a porpoise surf a wave, or a sea otter slide down a rock? Atavism is a primal trait in humans and animals that drives us to do what we do – what ought to come naturally – it’s the inherentnature of living things to play. Atavism is why we ride the way we ride; From mashing the city on a track bike, riding singletrack on a ‘cross bike and shredding trails on a mountain bike. Take the time to get rad and tell the tale.

    Want to contribute? Salvatore Ferragamo Leather GrommetEmbellished Sandals cheap for nice cheap sale buy 3IQQJl

    Submit a product for review

    Rebecca Minkoff Leather Studded Oxfords clearance how much sale pictures discount low shipping fee deals online ebay sale online 1zjn1TFi

    Interested in advertising? email the Radavist .

    Our comment policy is simple : we welcome and value tactful discourse and opinions. You don’t have to agree with our views but please deliver your concerns in a polite and personable manner.This is a safe place, all are welcome to engage in this community. That said, there iszero-tolerance for: racism, sexism, trolling, and slander.

    Unless otherwise noted, we do not accept funds for content. This website runs on ad revenue, however, the advertisements do not influence or affect the content or opinions of the authors. If you have concerns or questions, feel free to drop them in the comments on the relevant post.

    The federal legal standards in the U.S. for ensuring humane treatment during experimentation are incredibly permissive, yet they are still frequently violated by corporations and academic facilities. And when these laws are violated, virtually nothing happens to the offenders, even when the violations are egregious and result in severe suffering, or even death, for the dogs.

    Federal oversight of breeders and research facilities has been notoriously lax for years, to the point where penalties for even the most egregious abuses are systematically reduced to such a low level that they barely register. This laxity has worsened in the Trump era, with the new Republican administration placing more agricultural industry executives at the helm of oversight agencies than ever before.

    Theinspector generalfound that the Animal Care Unit “did not follow its own criteria in closing at least 59 cases that involved grave (e.g., animal deaths) or repeat welfare violations.” Even when violators were punished, the agency ensured that the punishments were so trivial that they would inflict no real consequences.

    At times, the inspector generalreport documented, “some violators that committed grave violations only received official warning letters,” and even where violations “were mostly either serious (e.g., compromise the health and well-being of animals) or grave (e.g., result in animal deaths), violators were offered penalties reduced to between 57 and 97 percent of AWA’s authorized maximum penalty per violation, or 86 percent on average.”

    The USDA has been notoriously permissive, for decades, when it comes to corporate abusers of dogs for research purposes. In 1995, theinspector general found that “dealers and other facilities had little incentive to comply with AWA because monetary penalties were, in some cases, arbitrarily reduced and often so low that violators regarded them as a cost of doing business.”

    A decade later, nothing changed: Matters were just as grim, as the 2005inspector general report found that “in addition to reducing the penalty by 75 percent, APHIS offered other concessions — making penalties basically meaningless. Violators continued to consider the monetary stipulation as a normal cost of business, rather than a deterrent for violating the law.” In 2010, still nothing had changed: “an OIG audit of problematic dealers found that APHIS’ enforcement process was ineffective, and the agency was misusing its own guidelines to lower penalties for AWA violators.”

    As The Intercept has Christian Dior Suede CannageAccented Pumps authentic cheap price cheap largest supplier lFksd1i
    , much of this lax regulation in the context of industrial abuse of animals is the result of the revolving door form of legalized corruption that dominates so much of Washington. As our reporting noted, “The USDA is typically dominated by executives from the very factory farm industries that are most in need of vibrant regulation.”

    President Donald Trump’s appointee to head theUSDA, former Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue, has extensive ties to the agribusiness sector he’s now supposed to oversee and regulate, a history of lax enforcement of industry rules, and substantial contributions from corporations over which his department exercises regulatory supervision. It is thus unsurprising that the USDA, early in 2017, “abruptly removed inspection reports and other information from its website about the treatment of animals at thousands of research laboratories, zoos, dog breeding operations and other facilities,” according to the Washington Post .

    Got it
    Clover Canyon Printed Platform Sandals cheap price wholesale price QNxBR
    Home // Monitor on Psychology // Belle by Sigerson Morrison Leather Caged Sandals sale online shop discount online outlet free shipping authentic for sale wholesale price ODJwT
    // How to publish your journal paper


    Understanding the nuances of the process smooths the publishing ride.



    September 2002, Vol 33, No. 8

    Print version: page 50

    The Catch 22 in research publishing is that few authors work effectively in the process until after they've published a few manuscripts. The good news is that experienced journal editors and authors are willing to pass on their secrets of success. Here is their best advice.

    Have a focus and a vision

    Angela M. Neal-Barnett, PhD, of Kent State University and author of the forthcoming book, "Bad Nerves" (Simon Schuster, 2003), as well as numerous papers in multiple journals believes that the key to successfully publishing an article is to "get a vision"--a reason and purpose for writing. That concept isn't always familiar to academicians who often write because they have to for tenure or promotion, she says. But, she advises, while "academic wisdom [says] 'publish or perish,' ancient wisdom says 'without vision, the people will perish.'"

    Once you have a vision, says Neal-Barnett, write it down and keep it in constant view to remind you of your mission.

    Write clearly

    "There is no substitute for a good idea, for excellent research or for good, clean, clear writing," says Nora S. Newcombe, PhD, of Temple University, former editor of APA's .

    Newcombe endorses the advice of Cornell University's Daryl J. Bem, PhD, who in (Vol. 118, No. 2) wrote that a review article should tell "a straightforward tale of a circumscribed question in want of an answer. It is not a novel with subplots and flashbacks, but a short story with a single, linear narrative line. Let this line stand out in bold relief."

    Newcombe also admits that neatness counts. Though she tries not get in a "bad mood" about grammar mistakes or gross violations of APA style, she says, such mistakes do "give the impression that you're not so careful."

    Get a pre-review

    Don't send the manuscript to an editor until you have it reviewed with a fresh eye, warns Newcombe. Recruit two objective colleagues: one who is familiar with the research area, another who knows little or nothing about it. The former can provide technical advice, while the latter can determine whether your ideas are being communicated clearly.

    Many academic departments form reading groups to review each others' papers, says Elizabeth M. Altmaier, PhD, editor of . "New faculty should and can form reading groups where they can exchange drafts and get feedback to each other," she says.

    After you've gotten that fresh critique of your work, says Newcombe, listen to the pre-reviewer's advice. If the reviewer down the hall "didn't really understand page six and therefore got lost in page 13," she says, "don't just say they didn't read carefully--other people are going to make that same error."

    For a final check, some editors suggest having the manuscript professionally copy-edited (see Further reading ).

    Send your manuscript to the right journal

    Many rejections are the result of manuscript-journal mismatch--a discrepancy between the submitted paper and the journal's scope or mission. Newcombe advises authors to consider the "theoretical bent" of the papers that regularly appear in the journal before they submit a paper to it.

    A major faux pas is submitting your manuscript simply to get it reviewed, says Newcombe. She's heard authors say, "This is a small experiment that I know would never get published in that journal, but I would like to get some feedback." Not a good idea, Newcombe says, because it wastes editors' and reviewers' time, and those who reject it from the journal may also be the ones who have to review the paper when it's submitted to a different journal. "It's a small community out there. Don't use up your reviewers," she says.

    Beef up your cover letter

    Many authors don't realize the usefulness of cover letters, Newcombe says. In addition to stating "here it is" and that the paper conforms to ethical standards, Newcombe says the letter can contain the author's rationale for choosing the editor's journal--especially if it's not immediately apparent.

    The letter can also suggest reviewers for your manuscript, she says, especially in the case of a field that an editor isn't well-versed in. The flip side is also acceptable: Authors can suggest that certain people not review the manuscript for fear of potential bias. In both cases, authors can't expect the editor to follow the recommendations, says Newcombe. In fact, the editor may not follow any of them or may use all of them.

    Don't panic

    The overwhelming majority of initial journal manuscripts are rejected at first. "Remember, to get a lot of publications, you also will need to get lots of rejections," says Edward Diener, PhD, editor of APA's . Only a small proportion--5 to 10 percent--are accepted the first time they are submitted, and usually they are only accepted subject to revision. Since most papers are rejected from the start, says Newcombe, the key is whether the journal editors invite you to revise it.

    Read the reviews carefully

    In fact, anything aside from simply "reject," Neal-Barnett reminds, is a positive review. These include:

    Some reviewers may recommend submitting your work to a different journal. "They're not saying the article is hopeless," says Neal-Barnett, "they're just saying that it may not be right for that journal."

    If revision isn't invited following the initial rejection, many new authors may toss the manuscript and vow to never write again to or change programs. Newcombe's advice, though, is to read the reviews carefully and determine why that decision was made.

    If the research needs more studies or if the methodology needs to be changed somehow, "if you have a sincere interest in the area, do these things," says Newcombe. You can resubmit it as a new paper, noting the differences in the cover letter.

    Also keep in mind that "quite often, unfortunately, a journal will reject an article because it's novel or new for its time," says Newcombe. "If you feel that it is valid and good, then by all means, send it off to another journal."

    Gary R. VandenBos, PhD, APA's publisher, adds, "once you have published, you take a feedback letter for what it is--a good-news sign telling what you need to do to transform it into an acceptance." It can take three or so journal-paper publishing experiences to get the hang of the process, he says.

    Don't put off the revisions

    If you are invited to revise, "Do it, do it fast and don't procrastinate," says Newcombe. Also, she warns that because reviewers can at times ask for too much, authors should take each suggestion into consideration, but decide themselves which to implement.

    Be diplomatic

    What if reviewers disagree? "There is a wrong and a right way" to address dissention among reviewers, says Newcombe. She quotes from Daryl Bem's article:

    Wrong: "I have left the section on the animal studies unchanged. If reviewers A and C can't even agree on what the animals have developed, I must be doing something right."

    Right: "You will recall that reviewer A thought the animal studies should be described more fully whereas reviewer C thought they should be omitted. Other psychologists in my department agree with reviewer C that the animals cannot be a valid analogue to the human studies. So, I have dropped them from the text and have attached it as a footnote on page six."

    Ultimately, it's good to keep in mind that the road to being published isn't a lonely one: "All authors get lots of rejections--including senior authors such as me," says Diener. "The challenge," he says, "is to persevere, and improve one's papers over time."

    Accept: "Which almost nobody gets," she says.

    discount excellent Marc by Marc Jacobs Leather Cutout Flats cheap finishline MtaSv


    Shop for Hairdresser shirts, hoodies and gifts. Find Hairdresser designs printed with care on top quality garments.
    Sophia Webster Printed Patent Leather Sandals buy cheap eastbay from china cheap online EwHDF6Nz6
    Related to Hairdresser:
    Related to Hairdresser:
    I am a Hair Stylist T-Shirt

    <b>Are you you a hair stylist?</b><br><br>Here is a shirt with a list of SOME of the things we do on the back!<br><br><b>Available 10 days only</b><br><br>

    2/15 Barn Hair Horses Equine Equestrian

    <div> <img src=""><br> </div><div>Guaranteed safe and secure checkout via<b>PayPal/VISA/MASTERCARD.</b> </div><div><b><br></b></div><div>Clickthe<b>BIG GREEN BUTTON</b>to pick your size/color and order.</div>

    Few Hours Left To Buy! Don't Miss Out!

    <div><b><i>Limited Time Offer. SALE ENDS SOON!</i></b></div><div>NOT SOLD IN STORES - Don't Delay Get Yours TODAY.</div><div> <b><u>Your $10 Discount Has Been Applied</u></b><br> </div><div>It's a $33.95 value BUT you can order yours today with<b>$23.95</b>and have a collectors item.<b>Offer Ending soon.</b><br> </div><div><div> <b><u>Need A Hoodie?</u></b><b><u>==gt;<a href=";cid=5819amp;sid=back">CLICK HERE</a><a href=";cid=5819amp;sid=back"></a>lt;==</u></b> </div></div><div><br></div><b>100% Printed in the U.S.A - S</b><b>hip Worldwide</b><div> <div><div>When you press the<b>big green button</b>, you will be able to choose your size(s). Be sure to order before we<b>run out of stock!</b><br> </div></div> <div><b><br></b></div> <div><b>SSL SAFE amp; SECURE CHECKOUT via</b></div> <div><b>VISA | MC | DISC | AMEX | PAYPAL</b></div> <div><br></div> <div><u><b>TIP TO SAVE MONEY: Buy 2 or more and SAVE OVER 80% on shipping cost. </b></u></div> <div><br></div> <div><u>Looking for 4x, 5x? No Problem! Choose "Hanes Tagless Tee" and pick your size!</u></div> <div> <b>Don't forget to Like and Share!!!</b> </div> </div>

    Explore CBC

    Stay Connected

    Services and Information

    factory outlet Dolce amp; Gabbana Snakeskin PointedToe Pumps sale enjoy discount great deals buy online new T3lrwXTb

    ©2017 CBC/Radio-Canada. All rights reserved

    cheapest price sale largest supplier Walter Steiger Studded Mesh Pumps purchase cheap price CJwXLvB